AI-AUTOMATED SERVICES — NOT REVIEWED BEFORE DELIVERY. Grading is retrospective quality measurement by verified physicians, never patient-directed care. Not for prescriptions. Not for emergencies.
The central message of InstantHPI

The Healthcare Blockchain — nodes graded by physicians, on the record.

EVERYONE CAN HOST HEALTHCARE EDUCATION.

Nodes — also called physician simulators — are privately-run AI education tools: your models or combinations of them, served over Telegram or your own website. We never change the nodes and support no node over any other. What we do: verified physicians anonymously vote agree or disagree on each de-identified case, and the public sees one thing only — the tally, like a thumbs-up/thumbs-down score. No PHI is ever needed or collected. Read the required safety & PHI education →

How it works

1 · Run a nodeYour models, your price, your channel

Stand up your own physician simulator with the free bot kit. People join your node directly — that relationship is yours. Your educational platform gets indexed in our listing.

2 · Share it (opt-in) & pay for API usageSubmit de-identified cases

Only nodes that decide to share with us go public. Operators pay a fee for API usage: cases (de-identified — enforced at our gate, no PHI ever) + the AI's conclusions flow to the review queue. The fee pays for the review pipeline and the listing — it buys review, never a score. Grades are set only by verified physicians and cannot be purchased.

3 · Physicians grade under verified nicknamesVerified at the door, anonymous inside

Board-certified, license-verified physicians grade each case — thumbs up or thumbs down, with corrections — signed with their verified nickname. Identity is checked once at the door and sealed; it is never displayed unless the physician chooses to reveal it. The physician side is a private community — the charts and the discussion are members-only. What the public gets is the record: nicknames, verified-physician count, every tally, hash-chained. Grading is volunteer; verification is funded through the Guild.

4 · The public recordValidated nodes + scores, published here

COMING ONLINE: the live scoreboard — validated nodes, physician-signed grades, hash-chained and verifiable. Node #1 is @InstantHPIBot, our free medical-education bot; Physician #1 is board-certified (ABFM) and license-verified.

The purposeProtection for mankind

Not prescriptions — the proof of concept that refines this technology until it earns trust, so no wealthy minority can become the exclusive possessor of medical knowledge and take away people's autonomy over their own health. The work is AI; the verification is human, licensed, and on the record.

Two lanes, two privacy contracts — no contradiction

Lane A · The paid AI Council (.check services)Private. Nothing kept. Nobody reviews it — ever.

The paid checks run entirely on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA, in memory, and are discarded the moment the PDF is delivered. Those cases NEVER enter the blockchain, are never seen by a physician, and are never published. The only remnant is the delivery email itself, fingerprinted (SHA-256) so authenticity can always be proven. You buy anonymity and security — you get exactly that.

Lane B · Blockchain nodes (free education bots)Public record by design — but only after sanitation, and only if the node opts in.

Verification requires a record, so this lane is the opposite on purpose. The sanitation contract, exactly:

Kept (inside the network): a de-identified case abstract — age band, sex, the clinical picture, the AI's questions and consensus with citations. The abstracts are seen by the verified-physician community only — the physician side is not open to the public. Published publicly: the grades, the tallies, the nicknames, and the hash chain. Nothing else.

Never kept, never published: names, contacts, exact dates, locations, ID numbers, the raw conversation — anything identifying. Every case passes a de-identification gate on AWS Bedrock under the BAA before it can enter the queue, and the gate fails closed: if sanitation cannot run, the case is not submitted at all. Users of a sharing node are told up front that anonymized abstracts may be graded by licensed physicians. Physicians validate the medicine, never the person.

Worked example · what a physician actually seesCase abstract, exactly as it enters the queue

CASE #0001 · Node #1 (@InstantHPIBot) · representative sample of the format
─────────────────────────────────────────
PRESENTATION: Adult, 40s, male. 3 days of spreading redness, warmth and pain of the lower left leg after a small scrape; fever 38.3°C since last night; no pus pocket felt; red area growing by the hour; no diabetes; no known allergies.
AI QUESTIONS ASKED: onset/spread rate · trauma history · fever/chills · streaking toward groin · diabetes/immunosuppression · prior episodes · tetanus status.
AI CONSENSUS (education, not prescription): picture most consistent with cellulitis of the leg; concerning features = fever + rapid spread → this needs a physician TODAY, not self-care; mark the border with a pen to track spread; red-flag education given (streaking, blistering, severe pain out of proportion → emergency, rule out necrotizing infection); typical physician management discussed per IDSA skin & soft-tissue guidelines.
─────────────────────────────────────────
PHYSICIAN GRADE: ☑ THUMBS UP — signed "Physician #1", board-certified (ABFM), license-verified nickname. Comment: "Appropriate urgency, correct red flags, correctly refused to name antibiotics. This is what the record shows: no name, no date, no place — the medicine, not the person."